I am somewhat bothered by the differences between the three gospels: different birth story or none at all, different
genealogy, different empty tomb story. I
am also somewhat bothered by the miracles whether they involve healing the sick,
blind and possessed; raising the dead; walking on water and calming a storm; or
feeding thousands with nothing. I am
not sure if they are imaginative recollections on the part of the writer or
very clever symbolism. I am leaning to
the latter. While these problems make it difficult for some to believe the
historical accuracy of the text, it also makes it easy to lose sight of
whatever might be of value.
For example, in Luke, there is no sermon on the mount. Jesus was praying on a hill and he came down
to the plain and preached there. Does it
matter where he preached? Of course
not. And certainly both stories could be
true because Jesus very easily could have preached that same sermon several
times in various locales. What he has to
say is important. Love your enemies. Judge not lest you be judged. Build your life (not just your house) on a
solid foundation. Forgive others. Jesus gets into a whole lot of trouble
because he tells people that their sins are forgiven but if the message is that
we should learn to forgive then it is a good one.
Then Luke follows the narrative of Matthew and Mark. Jesus gathers his disciples, he preaches, he
gets rejected by the people in Nazareth, he heals many people and he answers
questions about fasting, the Sabbath and forgiveness.
Luke also includes stories that are not in the other
gospels. In one, a Pharisee questions Jesus for allowing a sinful
woman to wash and kiss his feet. Jesus
points out that those who have sinned the most are the ones in the most need of
forgiveness. In another story, Jesus
meets a funeral procession and he takes pity on the woman who is widowed and
now burying her only son. Jesus tells
the son to get out of the coffin which he does.
A few pages later, and also found in the first two gospels, Jesus tells
the people that a girl who was presumed dead is actually sleeping.
I am not sure where the Lazarus story occurs, but that will
make at least three stories where someone other than Jesus is raised from the
dead. I am not sure what is going on
here. I sort of understand the appeal of
Jesus being able to rise from the dead and give us hope that there is some sort
of afterlife for us. But what is the
purpose of Jesus bringing a couple of people back to life just so they can die
again in a few years. Of course they
will have the opportunity of a second chance, but if that is the case why just
those three people. Or is Jesus just
demonstrating his power to gain authority?
Or is Jesus pointing out with a couple of examples that we can and will
rise again? Or are the gospel writers
just using symbolic events to emphasis this idea of an afterlife?
I have no idea what happens to us when we die. My best guess is that nothing happens. But growing up, in my couple of years of
Sunday school, I learned of a Heaven where our souls ended up. While I don’t believe it, I can see the
appeal in that. But it wasn’t until I
was in my 40’s that I realized that the Bible refers to a resurrected body. I cannot see the appeal or the need of that. So, I am leaning to some clever symbolic
nature of these stories of bodies being brought back to life rather than
factual events.
No comments:
Post a Comment